Sun Nov 26, 2006 12:53 am
Mine's pretty good I guess. I have cable broadband through Time Warner.
Sun Nov 26, 2006 1:46 am
Dragonfire wrote:dracir512 wrote:
That can't be right.
EDIT:
I'm confused.
The reason why it's so slow for the second one is that NYC is about 10,350 miles away from you, so of course the connection to it will be extremely slow.
I was confused as to how the NYC upload speed could be higher, and I thought that my download speed couldn't be right, seeing as my connection has been slowed to 64kBps.
Sun Nov 26, 2006 3:50 pm
Um... well... can't really afford more than that :| (should be 1MB/512KB)
Sun Nov 26, 2006 5:23 pm
... 100 miles
Derby is about 20 miles.
I sincerely hope I read that wrong.
(Oh yes, Unlimited download)
Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:35 pm
I win.
I've actually had it peak at about 25,000 kbps once.
Sun Nov 26, 2006 9:53 pm
[From speedtest.net]
Download: 4200 kb/s
Upload: 356 kb/s
Distance: ~600 miles
Download: 4200 kb/s
Upload: 356 kb/s
Distance: ~600 miles
Mon Nov 27, 2006 1:10 am
I know nothing about this kind of stuff, but I do know mine's usually pretty fast.
EDIT: I just glanced back at the thread, and I totally pwn you all. Well, most of you. And the ones who beat me only win halfway.
Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:22 pm
Great. Actually, not.
Edit:
Better from long distances, apparently.
Fri Dec 01, 2006 5:19 am
This is with my fast internet, newly updated. Not amazing, but pretty good.
Fri Dec 01, 2006 12:46 pm
Something's wrong with the ping though.
Fri Dec 01, 2006 2:37 pm
Eh, I lose. About the location...should I be picking the one in my area (Fredrick, MD), or the one that was recommended (Kansas City, MO)? Either way, the results were the same, besides distance and latency.
Maybe I should show this to my mother, and make her realize whats up. Without ever experiencing a faster connection than dial-up, you dont realize how slow it actually is.