Anything and everything goes in here... within reason.
Topic locked

Thu Jan 27, 2005 5:28 am

hyperflutterby wrote:
Eo wrote:Continuing the Cap'n Crunch questions:
If you advance from Cap'n... do you become a Maj'r?


No I think Majors come before Captains in the chain of command. I could be wrong though.



Hmm... a hard question...

How many muscles does the average human have?


Question No. 12832 :
How many muscles are in the entire human body?

The number of skeletal, or voluntary, muscles in the human body is approximately 640.

:P

Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:25 pm

Will nobeast answer my question about the nails vinegar and hot pepper?

(I wonder if anyone gets it o.o)

I shall answer the question of whomsoever answers mine!

Thu Jan 27, 2005 11:39 pm

As shall I!

*Crickets chirp*

Still waiting....

Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:27 am

Okay, Dranzer:

Because the publishers are idiots.

Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:33 am

shrodingers cat .. riddle, is easy.
if you were to introduce a radioactive isotope into a sealed box alongside a cat, would it be dead and alive at the smaae time.
stupid question you might ask, but qauntem physics states that for somthings state (IE: death to living) there must be an outside observer, so with the cat in a sealed box (and ergo nothing to say its dead) then theoreticly the cat would be simeltaneously dead and alive.
makes no soddin sence to me (the experiment) but it was only an example he gave.

Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:26 am

hyperflutterby wrote:
Eo wrote:Continuing the Cap'n Crunch questions:
If you advance from Cap'n... do you become a Maj'r?


No I think Majors come before Captains in the chain of command. I could be wrong though.


Yeah, you're wrong...Major is above Captain.

Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:36 am

Why do dogs get such a bad rep in so many idioms? (die like a dog, work like a dog, treated like a dog, lapdog, bulldog, dog days, she's a dog...)

Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:39 am

Eo wrote:Okay, Dranzer:

Because the publishers are idiots.


Thanks for calling me idiot....

And its Captain first....

Are we stupid for not using most of our brain, or smart for not unlocking a terrible power that could be tapped in to when using the whole brain?

Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:41 am

(*Dranzer*) wrote:Are we stupid for not using most of our brain, or smart for not unlocking a terrible power that could be tapped in to when using the whole brain?


We use all of our brain, it's just we're only using 10% of the cortex at any given time.

Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:49 am

Tharkun wrote:
(*Dranzer*) wrote:Are we stupid for not using most of our brain, or smart for not unlocking a terrible power that could be tapped in to when using the whole brain?


We use all of our brain, it's just we're only using 10% of the cortex at any given time.


That's sort of what I meant. But what if we used a full 100%?

Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:52 am

(*Dranzer*) wrote:
Tharkun wrote:
(*Dranzer*) wrote:Are we stupid for not using most of our brain, or smart for not unlocking a terrible power that could be tapped in to when using the whole brain?


We use all of our brain, it's just we're only using 10% of the cortex at any given time.


That's sort of what I meant. But what if we used a full 100%?


Blood drainage, my friend.

EDIT: Any etymologists around here? I really want my dog question answered...
Topic locked