Sun Jul 17, 2005 10:45 pm
it would do alot of good.
but it wont get there.
is a shame, the cradle of human evolution and its one of the most depraved, corrupted places.
Kinda Apt really.
but it wont get there.
is a shame, the cradle of human evolution and its one of the most depraved, corrupted places.
Kinda Apt really.
Mon Jul 18, 2005 12:00 am
Jim wrote:Skullsplitter wrote:Jim wrote:Skullsplitter wrote:sir_michael wrote:Christopher wrote:'If the red light comes on above your seat, please move into the nearest gunnery bay, and await futher instructions. Under your seat you will find 2 days rations and one Sig Sauer P226'
This is interesting... but 6 billion is alot of money.
Given that nearly $200,000,000,000 has been spent on pwning iraq, A 33rd of that cost should surely be worth the security of the american people. Wasnt that WHY you went to war in the first place?
I didnt realise Sir Michael went to war with another country and "pwnd" them. And thats some paper round he must have.
Please dont make me warn you again. Im getting awfully tired of it now.
I obviously wasnt suggesting that he himself went to war.
Ah I see. You meant America. Political discussion in regards to war. 1 strike.
Wow, first time I've seen a public strike. By Jim. *Is suddenly VERY afraid*
Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:51 pm
Please stay on topic.
Mon Jul 18, 2005 3:20 pm
I believe that preventing attacks of planes is a good idea, I'd prefer to be on a plane that could prevent a missile attack than on one that is not, and I'd be willing to pay round about $21 for this.
Am I right in assuming that, on this forum at least, no violent conflicts have occured in the last 105 years? Don't mention the war!
Am I right in assuming that, on this forum at least, no violent conflicts have occured in the last 105 years? Don't mention the war!
Sat Jul 23, 2005 9:09 pm
sidewinders and sparrows are short-ranged and long-ranged missles..
Sun Jul 24, 2005 7:51 pm
Personally, I think it would be pretty funny looking if an airliner had a bunch of missiles attached to it, but this whole airline defense thing might be serious. However, you have to weigh the costs with the risks, and other things like that. If there's a plane that flies only a small amount of people regularly, that wouldn't likely be a prime target for someone wanting to cause mass mayhem. If they do start outfitting airliners though, I think they should do it in order of risk factors, y'know?