Tue Oct 03, 2006 5:29 am
Setekh wrote:Course there was also the chance the atmosphere would ignite when the first Atom bomb was used.
Or that a wave of Anti-matter would sweep away all of existance every time we fire up a Particle acelerator.
We gotta do it, or we'll never know.
Tue Oct 03, 2006 7:11 am
Christopher wrote:Haha. Stupid existance. That'll teach you.
Tue Oct 03, 2006 8:46 am
Kugetsu wrote:Eh, it's sort of strange, but why worry about the chance that we could all become nothing? If it were to happen, it'd be over so quickly, would anyone have any time to think "CRAP, that machine broke my existence!!!"? It's like a lot of things. You can not like it happening, but when it happens, you'll have no time to think otherwise, so it's pointless to worry about it.
Then again, there's the argument that if it DID destroy everything, then what would be the point of finding out if it did or not, if there's a possibility of no one ever finding the results? Part of science is to learn from experiments. If the experiment destroys us, it's partially ignoring the "learning" aspect of science, and thus pretty much wiping the countless years of work that makes science from existence. Sort of strange, that science can destroy itself, for it's own improvement, yet that improvement could mean the existence of science being lost forever. Then again, I suppose if you're going to gain such great knowledge like that, there has to be the possibility of losing something just as great.Christopher wrote:Haha. Stupid existance. That'll teach you.
Man-Kind: 1
Existence: 0
Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:14 am
DiscordantNote wrote:Setekh wrote:We create them on a fairl regular basis as is, so I doubt theres much danger.
That, and we are fairly certain how they work (Really big gravity wells. That's about it)
Really? How? And do we know exactly how big the gravity well is? Can we predict how big it will be for sure?
Ooh, miniature black holes. Now we won't need landfills anymore.
Seriously though, that's interesting. I wouldn't want to do that on or near Earth though. :\
Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:17 am
Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:18 am
Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:20 am
Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:23 am
Tue Oct 03, 2006 10:25 am
Setekh wrote:Thats was a big ZPM that drew its energy from a fully fledge reality rather than the pocket Universe that normal (Ickle) ones do right?
And that article was stolen from a far cooler man than that site
http://qntm.org/destroy
He writes a cracking good SCi-fi too
Being a prime example.
Tue Oct 03, 2006 11:29 am
Tue Oct 03, 2006 12:59 pm
Setekh wrote:News cast..
Multi-dimensional physics may finally get the go ahead![]()
But then...* They estimate the possibility of accidentally destroying the planet as extremely low.
Tue Oct 03, 2006 9:36 pm
zorg wrote:(yeah you're not exactly winning though, they're teaching ID in schools)
Wed Oct 04, 2006 5:26 pm
Wed Oct 04, 2006 7:18 pm
Anoohilator wrote:I really wouldn't mind if mankind was wiped outWould it really be so bad?
Wed Oct 04, 2006 8:36 pm