Sun Jul 17, 2005 10:57 pm
Matt wrote:Ammer wrote:I need to solve the following equation,
1600 = .25^n-1 (to the power of N minus 1)
I know how to solve it (The process and all) but I don't know how to simply 1600 so it can be .25 to the power of something. That way, I could equate the exponents and get n.
Can anyone help me?
First, using prime factors, you get out that 1600 = 2^6 x 5^2.
So, then we try to work out 25 in terms of powers of two.
25 = 2^x
.'. log2 25 = x
.'. (log 25)/(log 2) = x
.'. x = 4.64385619
.'. 1600 = 2^6 x 2^4.64385619
.'. 1600 = 2^10.64385619
.'. 1600 = 4^5.32192809
Think that works, and hope that is all clear. If you're confused about any of it, just ask
Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:12 am
Mon Jul 18, 2005 2:38 am
Yoshi wrote:23 weeks would be 23/52ths of a year. (Ugh, I hate interest questions.)
A = 6750 (1 + (0.09/12))^(23/52 * 12)
A = 7023.08
Something like that...if I read your problem correctly...
Mon Jul 18, 2005 1:50 pm
Ammer wrote:Matt wrote:Ammer wrote:I need to solve the following equation,
1600 = .25^n-1 (to the power of N minus 1)
I know how to solve it (The process and all) but I don't know how to simply 1600 so it can be .25 to the power of something. That way, I could equate the exponents and get n.
Can anyone help me?
First, using prime factors, you get out that 1600 = 2^6 x 5^2.
So, then we try to work out 25 in terms of powers of two.
25 = 2^x
.'. log2 25 = x
.'. (log 25)/(log 2) = x
.'. x = 4.64385619
.'. 1600 = 2^6 x 2^4.64385619
.'. 1600 = 2^10.64385619
.'. 1600 = 4^5.32192809
Think that works, and hope that is all clear. If you're confused about any of it, just ask
What I'm confused about is why you used 25 when the number was .25? Did you multiply it by 10 to get it to 25? And I'm not sure I get this log stuff, I've never seen it used before.
Thanks for helping me though.
Mon Jul 18, 2005 7:32 pm
Yoshi wrote:Hey, I need a bit of language help. French, that is.
My teacher's explained the concept of imparfait to us, and that you use it to describe something that 1/ happens repetitively, 2/ regards emotion, 3/ regards mental state, 4/ regards physical state, or 5/ is a developing action.
All this versus passé composé which has to do with a completed action or something that happens in a defined time.
However, all that seems to confuse the heck out of me and I'm overanalysing everything. If possible, can anyone please define things...better, I suppose? :\
Mon Jul 18, 2005 8:43 pm
shapu wrote:Ammer wrote:Matt wrote:Ammer wrote:I need to solve the following equation,
1600 = .25^n-1 (to the power of N minus 1)
I know how to solve it (The process and all) but I don't know how to simply 1600 so it can be .25 to the power of something. That way, I could equate the exponents and get n.
Can anyone help me?
First, using prime factors, you get out that 1600 = 2^6 x 5^2.
So, then we try to work out 25 in terms of powers of two.
25 = 2^x
.'. log2 25 = x
.'. (log 25)/(log 2) = x
.'. x = 4.64385619
.'. 1600 = 2^6 x 2^4.64385619
.'. 1600 = 2^10.64385619
.'. 1600 = 4^5.32192809
Think that works, and hope that is all clear. If you're confused about any of it, just ask
What I'm confused about is why you used 25 when the number was .25? Did you multiply it by 10 to get it to 25? And I'm not sure I get this log stuff, I've never seen it used before.
Thanks for helping me though.
Because 1600=5^2 x 2^6, or 25x2^6.
Tue Jul 19, 2005 8:03 am
Matt wrote:Yoshi wrote:Hey, I need a bit of language help. French, that is.
My teacher's explained the concept of imparfait to us, and that you use it to describe something that 1/ happens repetitively, 2/ regards emotion, 3/ regards mental state, 4/ regards physical state, or 5/ is a developing action.
All this versus passé composé which has to do with a completed action or something that happens in a defined time.
However, all that seems to confuse the heck out of me and I'm overanalysing everything. If possible, can anyone please define things...better, I suppose? :\
Imparfait is generally used for events that have happened continually. For example:
Mark ate the dog.
(Mark a mangé le chien)
uses the passé composé because Mark went up, and ate the dog. He didn't eat the dog for several days. However
Mark was playing with the dog
(Mark jouait avec le chien)
uses the imperfect because he was playing with the dog for several hours. THat's basically what it says.It's like the difference between "was ____ing" and "_______ed" in English.
Plus: You more or less always use the imperfect for être and avoir.
In the future, there is an absoultely brilliant site which you can use here
Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:06 am
Tue Jul 19, 2005 9:32 pm
Matt wrote:Yoshi wrote:Hey, I need a bit of language help. French, that is.
My teacher's explained the concept of imparfait to us, and that you use it to describe something that 1/ happens repetitively, 2/ regards emotion, 3/ regards mental state, 4/ regards physical state, or 5/ is a developing action.
All this versus passé composé which has to do with a completed action or something that happens in a defined time.
However, all that seems to confuse the heck out of me and I'm overanalysing everything. If possible, can anyone please define things...better, I suppose? :\
Imparfait is generally used for events that have happened continually. For example:
Mark ate the dog.
(Mark a mangé le chien)
uses the passé composé because Mark went up, and ate the dog. He didn't eat the dog for several days. However
Mark was playing with the dog
(Mark jouait avec le chien)
uses the imperfect because he was playing with the dog for several hours. THat's basically what it says. :) It's like the difference between "was ____ing" and "_______ed" in English.
Plus: You more or less always use the imperfect for être and avoir.
In the future, there is an absoultely brilliant site which you can use here
Wed Jul 20, 2005 4:07 am
Wed Jul 20, 2005 8:14 am
M. Bison wrote:To differentiate 3(sec(x))^3, you use the power rule with the chain rule for derivatives.
(3(sec(x))^3)' = 9(sec(x))^2 * (sec(x))' = 9(sec(x))^2 * sec(x)tan(x) = 9(sec(x))^3*tan(x).
Because differentiation cancels the effect of integration, we know that:
∫9(sec(x))^3*tan(x) dx = 3(sec(x))^3 + C
Thus, to get ∫18(sec(x))^3*tan(x), multiply both sides by 2.
∫18(sec(x))^3*tan(x) dx = 6(sec(x))^3 + C
Your second question is simply plugging in numbers by the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
You know the antiderivative is 3e^(x/3), so evaluate it from 6ln2 to 6ln4.
3e^(6ln(4)/3) - 3e^(6ln(2)/3).
Factor out a 3 and divide out the 3 in the exponent:
3(e^(2ln(4)) - e^(2ln(2)))
Remember e^x and ln(x) are inverse functions. Thus, e^(2ln(4)) causes the e and ln(4) to cancel to: 4^2, or 16. Similarly, e^(2ln(2)) = 2^2, or 4.
16 - 4 = 12. Don't forget the 3 we factored out earlier; 12 * 3 = 36.
Wed Jul 20, 2005 10:48 pm
Thu Sep 08, 2005 7:40 am
Thu Sep 08, 2005 3:21 pm
Fri Sep 09, 2005 3:47 am
.neko. wrote:Ok, we're doing review in Chemistry this week and I cant figure out/remember/find how to do this question in my old text book. If someone with some knowledge of high school chemistry could explain what Im supposed to do I think I can solve it on my own.
1330 mL of gaseous hydrogen were at STP. The pressure was reduced at a constant temperature. The new volume was 1520mL. What was the new pressure in mm Hg?