Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:53 pm
Setekh wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:why do british people put that pointless extra "u" in the word "color"?
we didnt, you took it out.
why did you take it out?
well, it goes back to the closing days of your little insurgant war, having realised you would win (we were more concerned with the african colonies, much more lucrative) you thought you needed your own language.
so you took a few "u"s out of our language.
Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:54 pm
Setekh wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:why do british people put that pointless extra "u" in the word "color"?
we didnt, you took it out.
why did you take it out?
well, it goes back to the closing days of your little insurgant war, having realised you would win (we were more concerned with the african colonies, much more lucrative) you thought you needed your own language.
so you took a few "u"s out of our language.
Tue Jan 18, 2005 8:58 pm
Twizzler0171 wrote:_jaye_ wrote:Who are you?
I am me. *Puts on a Rafiki-type voice* The question is... who are you?
Why is it that when you open a bottle of Squirt, it doesn't go squirt, but *Fsst*?
Are there wild/non-domesticated cows?
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:40 pm
Amethyst wrote:Zero wrote:...How much wood COULD a woodchuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood?
I think the REAL question is 'How many swords could a sword chuck chuck if a sword chuck could chuck swords?'
One of my favorite questions...
'Could Jesus microwave a burrito so hot that he himself couldn't eat it?'
Tue Jan 18, 2005 9:54 pm
shapu wrote:Setekh wrote:skizzy the wonder lizard wrote:why do british people put that pointless extra "u" in the word "color"?
we didnt, you took it out.
why did you take it out?
well, it goes back to the closing days of your little insurgant war, having realised you would win (we were more concerned with the african colonies, much more lucrative) you thought you needed your own language.
so you took a few "u"s out of our language.
Noah Webster, when writing his great American Dictionary, actually wanted to re-spell a lot of words, like Thru (in place of through) and Tho (though). He decided against it.
Tue Jan 18, 2005 10:49 pm
JellyFish72 wrote:Are there wild/non-domesticated cows?
My question is, how did female wild cows exist if they have to be milked every day???
Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:16 pm
Chromefox wrote:Yes, there were wild cows. They were supposedly rather aggressive, too.
And to answer your question, domestic cows on farms are artificially inseminated so that they will produce milk for their calves (which of course become veal if male). Without calves there to drink the milk, they have to be milked by farmers. But if a cow isn't impregnated, she will not produce milk. For this reason, farmers artificially inseminate their cows constantly, keeping them pregnant for an unnaturally long period of their lives.
It's pretty cruel and one of the answers I give to why I don't drink milk.
Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:17 pm
Qanda wrote:I've been attending a course on philosophy and the teacher likes to ask infuriating philosophical questions like:
How do you know that you know?
How do you know that what you know is right?
Does the Authority (law, government, parents, teachers etc) ask us do something because it is right or is something right because the Authority says so?
EDIT: And a fun little philosophical problem...An unrepentant conman and habitual liar was sentenced to death. The judge ordered that on day he was to be killed, he could choose to write a statement which was totally true. If he told a truth, he would be pardoned from execution and instead be imprisoned for 10 years. If he told an untruth, he would be executed.
On that day, the conman wrote the following statement, "I will be executed."
Should he be executed or imprisoned?
(This is similar to another problem: A person says, "I am lying". With this statement, is he lying or telling the truth?)
Try answering those.
Tue Jan 18, 2005 11:40 pm
ChromeFox wrote:JellyFish72 wrote:Are there wild/non-domesticated cows?
My question is, how did female wild cows exist if they have to be milked every day???
Yes, there were wild cows. They were supposedly rather aggressive, too.
And to answer your question, domestic cows on farms are artificially inseminated so that they will produce milk for their calves (which of course become veal if male). Without calves there to drink the milk, they have to be milked by farmers. But if a cow isn't impregnated, she will not produce milk. For this reason, farmers artificially inseminate their cows constantly, keeping them pregnant for an unnaturally long period of their lives.
It's pretty cruel and one of the answers I give to why I don't drink milk.
Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:12 am
Full Metal Alchemist wrote:Buffalo x Cow = BEEFALO! w00t! i learned it it science. XD
Wed Jan 19, 2005 12:16 am
Full Metal Alchemist wrote:Buffalo x Cow = BEEFALO! w00t! i learned it it science. XD
Wed Jan 19, 2005 1:02 am
Wed Jan 19, 2005 1:06 am
Zero wrote:Full Metal Alchemist wrote:Buffalo x Cow = BEEFALO! w00t! i learned it it science. XD
Yeah? Well in science we learned that a Zebra and a Donkey make a Zonkey.
...What would a Beefalo and a Zonkey make? XD
Wed Jan 19, 2005 1:32 am
Zero wrote:Full Metal Alchemist wrote:Buffalo x Cow = BEEFALO! w00t! i learned it it science. XD
Yeah? Well in science we learned that a Zebra and a Donkey make a Zonkey.
...What would a Beefalo and a Zonkey make? XD
Wed Jan 19, 2005 3:38 am
Zero wrote:Full Metal Alchemist wrote:Buffalo x Cow = BEEFALO! w00t! i learned it it science. XD
Yeah? Well in science we learned that a Zebra and a Donkey make a Zonkey.
...What would a Beefalo and a Zonkey make? XD