Ixistant wrote:
coming2atvnearu wrote:
Twinkle wrote:
Igg wrote:
Sorry for calling you Twinkly, by the way, not got my eye on the ball there
If you weren't with your nan, what would you have thought? (and it's never a good idea to watch something with 'Jerry Springer' in the title with your nan!)
I quite like being called Twinkly.
Even if I wasn't with my nan I still would have found it sick. There's something about weird sexual baby fetishes that disturbs me.
Now I didn't watch it, but doesn't it condemn this kind of thing? I thought it had something to do with Jerry Springer eventually realizing the kind of evil he was making an accepted part of society.
Or maybe I just heard wrong.
Right. Here's the run-down of the show. The first act is an operatical version of The Jerry Springer Show. The guy who wanted to be a baby was one of the guests and he is made a guest as a "typical" example of the *ahem* strange people who go on the show. And it actually only had about 400 swear words in there if you didn't do what the BBC was doing and which led them to their total of 8000+ swear words as they were counting every single time a cast member swore (like maybe the line was "F'ing f'ers", if all 36 cast members said that at the same time it would be counted as 72 swear words). But why would you watch it with your nan twinkle-san! Why!
Exactly, that's just what I was about to say. 8000 would completely tear apart world records, and that number is just held for publicity. The estimate of a friend of mine, who did try to count all he could, was about 368. The chorus and such added on to this. After seeing it for myself, I find it entertaining and rather funny, just not suitable for TV or someone looking for a 'family program'. I can see how some people find it morally offensive, but c'mon! It has tap-dancing Klu Klux Klan members! It doesn' t get any better than that
.
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
