Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:33 pm
Sun Mar 13, 2005 3:58 pm
Sun Mar 13, 2005 4:52 pm
Sun Mar 13, 2005 5:20 pm
Ashes wrote:ahoteinrun wrote:The Lion King wasn't a landmark in animation. It didn't do anything absolutely spectacular. The techniques used in it were modified from Beauty and the Beast, and from the Great Mouse Detective. It was a good movie, but I liked the Incredibles more.
Why?
Maybe because i'm older now. I love the Lion king, but after taking design and history courses... theres just so much hilarity in The Incredibles involed with E, and the houses... I just can't get over it. And i'll be buying it tuesday.
Not a landmark? When did you see five hundred individual scripted wildebeest running on screen at once in Beauty & The Beast?
I don't think your are giving the animators the credit they deserve. You know they all had to be indidividually painted in pre-productionm in order to keep track of them all.
Sun Mar 13, 2005 7:12 pm
Sun Mar 13, 2005 8:28 pm
Sun Mar 13, 2005 8:44 pm
Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:02 pm
Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:17 pm
JellyFish72 wrote:The Incredibles... The Lion King was good, but it didn't really NEED a sequel... The Incredibles, it needs a sequel... it was just very clever, and one of the few movies that my parents could stay awake through...
Sun Mar 13, 2005 11:45 pm
ahoteinrun wrote:Ashes wrote:ahoteinrun wrote:The Lion King wasn't a landmark in animation. It didn't do anything absolutely spectacular. The techniques used in it were modified from Beauty and the Beast, and from the Great Mouse Detective. It was a good movie, but I liked the Incredibles more.
Why?
Maybe because i'm older now. I love the Lion king, but after taking design and history courses... theres just so much hilarity in The Incredibles involed with E, and the houses... I just can't get over it. And i'll be buying it tuesday.
Not a landmark? When did you see five hundred individual scripted wildebeest running on screen at once in Beauty & The Beast?
I don't think your are giving the animators the credit they deserve. You know they all had to be indidividually painted in pre-productionm in order to keep track of them all.
The scene was one scene. Using technology that they developed from Beauty and the Beast. It was a difficult scene, YES, but I don't feel it was as landmark as other things Disney has done that revolutionized the world of animation.
And trust me, i've looked seriously into being an animator. I'm in my BFA of fine arts, i've done an animation project with my college. I do know what i'm talking about, since I have inked sheet after sheet of hand done drawing for the animation I worked on.
Mon Mar 14, 2005 5:42 am
Ashes wrote:ahoteinrun wrote:Ashes wrote:ahoteinrun wrote:The Lion King wasn't a landmark in animation. It didn't do anything absolutely spectacular. The techniques used in it were modified from Beauty and the Beast, and from the Great Mouse Detective. It was a good movie, but I liked the Incredibles more.
Why?
Maybe because i'm older now. I love the Lion king, but after taking design and history courses... theres just so much hilarity in The Incredibles involed with E, and the houses... I just can't get over it. And i'll be buying it tuesday.
Not a landmark? When did you see five hundred individual scripted wildebeest running on screen at once in Beauty & The Beast?
I don't think your are giving the animators the credit they deserve. You know they all had to be indidividually painted in pre-productionm in order to keep track of them all.
The scene was one scene. Using technology that they developed from Beauty and the Beast. It was a difficult scene, YES, but I don't feel it was as landmark as other things Disney has done that revolutionized the world of animation.
And trust me, i've looked seriously into being an animator. I'm in my BFA of fine arts, i've done an animation project with my college. I do know what i'm talking about, since I have inked sheet after sheet of hand done drawing for the animation I worked on.
I'm not denying your ability in the slightest, only your appreciation of the effort. True, some of the technology used was applied to films before The Lion King (all of it, in fact) but this was, and always will be, Disney's crowning achievement. It is a seamless synthesis of multi-cultural themes, one part love story, another part survival epic. A morality tale told by the best people in the business. There is no animated film that combines all of the qualities that this movie displays. You know how John Lasseter must have felt when he finished Toy Story 2. At the time, it was the be all and end all of computer generated animation. There simply wasn't anything to compare with it at that moment in time. The Lion King was at that point years before it, and as far as marrying standard animation and newer forms of technology are concerned, it has never (and will never) be bettered.
Mon Mar 14, 2005 9:21 pm
Tue Mar 15, 2005 1:15 am
ahoteinrun wrote:Ya know...
Maybe if you havn't seen both movies; you shouldn't VOTE.
Because it's NOT a FAIR comparison.
Just a thought.
Tue Mar 15, 2005 1:29 am
Tue Mar 15, 2005 8:16 pm