The big screen and the small screen... together at last! Hurrah!
Sun Jan 09, 2005 3:04 am
Alisquid wrote:I looks awfull. Its a bad idea to make a sequal after the movies turned at least five*cough*Star Wars*cough* but this just looks dum. The mask was good, and the ending was good. I don't need a sequal. Pokemon Kid, you took the rest of this rant right out of my mouth. My thoughts exactly.
Star Wars is different though. There was a history implied in the original films that could allow for the prequels to be made.
The Mask is different though. There really is no history nor a heavily implied future. The first movie had enough closure to it.
Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:07 pm
All these sequels that bound to be craptastic have to stop. --;;
That's all I'm saying.
Fri Jan 14, 2005 1:38 pm
two words: Oh Dear
Fri Jan 14, 2005 2:47 pm
Well, two pointers from my part:
I did not like the first Mask movie anyway.
Sequels usually suck.
Conclusion:
This sequel will probably suck more than sequels usually do.
Note: Only my opinion and thoughts

*watches back for too serious and aggressive ppters*
Mon Jan 24, 2005 6:40 am
this is hard because *alan cumming* is in the sequal to the mask, as loki no less. and it's going to be the most horrible movie ever, but it's *alan cumming* which is so much of a heartwrenching horrible thing. because he must be in all of the worst movies ever.
Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:33 pm
Jim Carey isn't even in it! He made the Mask! Not worth seeing IMO...
Mon Jan 24, 2005 9:53 pm
I didn't like the first Mask so I'll definetly NOT see this one.
Sounds like it's just going to be cheesy jokes with high budget fx.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.
phpBB Mobile / SEO by Artodia.