Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:23 pm
Setekh wrote:urge to kill... normal?!
i accepted the fact that idiots would rule the world when a girl handed in GCSE coursework in lesser 1337 (y'know, the c00l, pwn3d, f33r rubbish)
and had it marked, at a high pass (B i think)
well, as i wandered off while typing this i seem to have forgotten the rest of my point.
That. Actually. Happened?
Forgive me if I sound disbelieving of you. It's not you yourself I'm inclined to disbelieve. It's the sanity of the markers. They should have failed her. Completely. Disastrously. They should not have been able to comprehend it in the first place, which evidently they must have. Have you any idea what subject that was for? (Here I am, hoping that it's one I don't do, because if it is, I will feel dirty and my grades will be much less worth the hard work.)
There's a difference between chatspeak and abbreviations. The latter is for very short phrases or words. These save time typing, especially when in a rush. The former is a whole manner of communication that expects the audience to be able to understand and respond in the same way. (Personally, I think it would only be polite to ask a person you don't converse with often if they would mind if you used chatspeak, especially of the indecipherable variety, before you commence. Not everyone's accustomed to chatspeak.)
Something is very, very wrong when chatspeak appears in a publication to help you go to college. Seriously, chatspeak implies informality and a subject of a non-serious nature. Is college now meant to be taken as though it's one great big fat joke and it's not actually important or serious enough to be treated with some formality and, thus, respect?
I have a new life mission: to indoctrinate small children on the matter of learning a language properly.
Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:29 pm
Lillie wrote:I have a new life mission: to indoctrinate small children on the matter of learning a language properly.
That's not called indoctrination. It's called education.
*takes out grammar and spelling gun*
*keeps it again after seeing Igg*
Sun Apr 17, 2005 12:44 pm
*screams* Oh how I hate it so. 
Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:06 pm
How pathetic...
Heh, I'm literally lost for words. Honest to God.
Heh, I'm literally lost for words. Honest to God.
Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:11 pm
At least it wasn't higher 1337...
Then I'd have got really agrivated.
Then I'd have got really agrivated.
Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:14 pm
That is honestly just... strange. *steals Qanda's grammar and spelling gun*
Qanda wrote:Lillie wrote:I have a new life mission: to indoctrinate small children on the matter of learning a language properly.
That's not called indoctrination. It's called education.
Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:24 pm
\/\/ 0\/\/, 1 (4n'7 B3|13\/3 7h47 50/\/\3 p30p|3 h4\/3 7h3 71/\/\3 70 \/\/r173 |13k 7h15.
That took me 5 minutes to write......
That took me 5 minutes to write......
Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:34 pm
(*Dranzer*) wrote:\/\/ 0\/\/, 1 (4n'7 B3|13\/3 7h47 50/\/\3 p30p|3 h4\/3 7h3 71/\/\3 70 \/\/r173 |13k 7h15.
1 |)0/\/'7, 1 5|-|0|_| |_ |) 83 \/\/0r|<!/\/(_-, 8|_|7, 0|-| \/\/311. 7|-|15 15 (00|_3r!!!
Sun Apr 17, 2005 1:34 pm
(*Dranzer*) wrote:\/\/ 0\/\/, 1 (4n'7 B3|13\/3 7h47 50/\/\3 p30p|3 h4\/3 7h3 71/\/\3 70 \/\/r173 |13k 7h15.
That took me 5 minutes to write......
Took me 10 seconds to read (normally would take 3...)
Sun Apr 17, 2005 2:37 pm
\/\/0µ£Ð ¥0µ ß3£13\/3 7|-|1$ 0|\|£¥ 700|{ 4 900Ð 30 $3(0|\|Ð$ 70 \/\/®173? 1 ®µ£3, 0|-| ¥34|-|!
Translation: 'Would you belive this only took a good 30 seconds to write? I rule, oh yeah!'
But that's upper 1337 to the extreme.
Anyway, I've seen this on TV ads so often now, it's not funny. And on SMS ads as well. Yes, I get SMS ads from Optus X_x And they write in chatspeak.
You see it mostly in those ringtone ads though, on TV. But I've seen it in my cousin's magazines. Sh'es got a whole collection of all those 'Dolly' and 'Girlfriend' magazines, and just on the covers, you can see titles like 'Top Tips for Ur skin' or something like that. Bah, Chatspeak is killing the world, I say.
Translation: 'Would you belive this only took a good 30 seconds to write? I rule, oh yeah!'
But that's upper 1337 to the extreme.
Anyway, I've seen this on TV ads so often now, it's not funny. And on SMS ads as well. Yes, I get SMS ads from Optus X_x And they write in chatspeak.
You see it mostly in those ringtone ads though, on TV. But I've seen it in my cousin's magazines. Sh'es got a whole collection of all those 'Dolly' and 'Girlfriend' magazines, and just on the covers, you can see titles like 'Top Tips for Ur skin' or something like that. Bah, Chatspeak is killing the world, I say.
Sun Apr 17, 2005 2:43 pm
political correctness is killing the world.
chatspeak is just giving it a good kicking.
chatspeak is just giving it a good kicking.
Sun Apr 17, 2005 3:01 pm
Hm. Interesting idea... both rot our minds. I don't know which is worse.
Unlike chatspeak, at least political correctness started with good intentions - the intention of being considerate to others. Yes, PC has gone too far, but in its pristine form it's not a bad idea. Chatspeak was born out of laziness.
I think we could kill both - chatspeak and PC - just by making everyone read Orwell's Politics and the English Language. The premise of the essay is that the deterioration of our language signifies a deterioration in our ability to think clearly. And both chatspeak and PC signify a deterioration of our language.
Unlike chatspeak, at least political correctness started with good intentions - the intention of being considerate to others. Yes, PC has gone too far, but in its pristine form it's not a bad idea. Chatspeak was born out of laziness.
I think we could kill both - chatspeak and PC - just by making everyone read Orwell's Politics and the English Language. The premise of the essay is that the deterioration of our language signifies a deterioration in our ability to think clearly. And both chatspeak and PC signify a deterioration of our language.
Sun Apr 17, 2005 3:06 pm
Setekh wrote:political correctness is killing the world.
chatspeak is just giving it a good kicking.
I'm not sure of the correlation between PCness and chatspeak...
Great link, Miss Padfoot. I'm such a sucker for the English language and that article will provide much food for thought.
Sun Apr 17, 2005 4:17 pm
lyk3 OMG dat 1z so tru 1 nvr luk dwn 0n sum1 hu uz3z t3h chtsp33k t3y kud b vry 5mrt but thur iznt a r3zun 2 tip3 lyk3 yor3 f1v3 y33rz uld 3vri1 k4n 4kt lyk3 0MG dunt luk dwn 0n p33pul hu uz teh cht5p33k but 1f 1 s3nt a m35ug3 lyk3 th4t 2u 1 d0wt u wud b lyk3 0 wll 4z l0ng 4z t3hy r m33n1ng 5umth1ng ten th3r3z n0 r3zun 2 ku3zt0n th3r 5murtn355 cuz t3hy n0 t3hy r teh k3w1n3s!!111!111!!1!!!! 1 s3r33uzly d0wt t4t n31 c4n st4nd up 4nd s4y 1 t1nk d4t pur5un 1z t3h 5murtn355 m4yb3 w3 4rnt th1nk1ng uv teh s4m3 l3v3l uv ch4tsp33k but 4t l33st 0n th15 l3v3l 1 dunt s33 h0w u c4nt ku3zt0n 4 p3rsunz 5murtn3ss t3hy 4rnt tr1ng 2 c0m00n1k4tz0rs tehy r g01n 0wt uv teh1r w4y 2 b3 4n0y1ng mutch lyk3 th1s m3s1g3 t3hy pwnz0rz lyk3 3vry1 1n t3h wurld!!11!111111 t3h p01nt uv d1z m35ug3 1z 2 4d4pt t3h p33pul 2 t3h 4cku4l 4n0y4nc3 uv t3h cht5p33k 4nd teh 1337n355 n0t 2 4ckt lyk3 4n 4r53 1n t3h pr0c3z 1 n0 1 c4nt d0 t3h 1337n355 r1ht 4z w3ll 4nd y3z t3h1r 1z m4j0r s4rc4zm 1nv0lv3d
No, that isn't your every day chatspeak, but I see more of this than the basic: "how r u doin" and "dat iz lyk gr8". Sometimes the content isn't worth the hassle of having to spend extra time decoding a message that you can easily realize isn't worth reading if in basic English. If I typed that message to a random person on PPT, they would probably get some friends and beat me with baseball bats and bricks the first time they saw me on the street.
No, that isn't your every day chatspeak, but I see more of this than the basic: "how r u doin" and "dat iz lyk gr8". Sometimes the content isn't worth the hassle of having to spend extra time decoding a message that you can easily realize isn't worth reading if in basic English. If I typed that message to a random person on PPT, they would probably get some friends and beat me with baseball bats and bricks the first time they saw me on the street.