Pink Poogle Toy Forum

Nope, they were all PG. Generally speaking, each book/movie gets more violent though.

Yup, probably by the end a few of them will be rated 14A

At least this means it wasn't toned down for little kids, hopefully.

-crossfingers-

*wonders if Hagrid's house will move again*

Me too as well as the Whomping Willow. I hated where it was located :\

I really don't care what the movie it rated. Though the idea of a R rating for a HP movie would be quite interesting.

Well see we were thinking about when they make the 6th film- you know in the book where Harry rushes out to Hagrid's hut? How's he going to manage that quickly if he has to get down some sort of cliff first?

hehehe He better figure out a way to use his broom or he might just as well tumble his way down.

He'll end up using the zip line from "Gladiators".

I'd fall in love with the director forever if he did that.

Why is it PG-13? I mean, come on, Wormtail only kind of cut off his hand. We all know he was faking it.



...I couldn't resist.

But really, I'm glad it'll be PG-13. I quite liked it when Pettigrew chopped off his hand.

Not because I liked it, I mean I enjoyed having that in there so I could shove it in the face of people who were all, "OMG THEY'RE SUCH HAPPY LITTLE 'LET'S GO FROLICKING IN A FIELD AND FOLLOW THE BUTTERFLIES, WHEEEEEE' CHILDREN'S BOOKS!!! ~*^_^*~".

Eh, I have no idea what you just said. People who haven't read the book will probably be smart enough to not go on a Harry Potter thread.

THANK YOU LORD! I am so sick of parents bringing their obnoxious little kids into the theatre so I have to listen to litanies of "I NEED TO MAKE PEEPEES" while I'm trying to enjoy the film.

Besides, little kids would be terrified of this movie. There's some pretty intense stuff in the books as well. Contrary to popular belief, these aren't children's books. I don't know about you, but I can't recall any Ramona Quimby or Babysitter's Club installments featuring dismemberment, torture, murder, or drinking the blood of a dead unicorn.

When they're in the kids' section, they're kids' books.

I though BabySitters Club was for lamewad sheltered teenagers?

Maybe I read the wrong books in my youth...

THANK YOU FOREVER FOR SAYING THAT.

People seem to think, "Ooh, boy wizard who can save the world! LET ME READ IT TO MY TWO YEAR OLD. ^_^"

Of course, when they get to GoF and everything's all, "Mmmy, why does that bad man have a knife?" "I don't know, baby ickly dearest, let's read on!" "MUMMY WHY DID HE CUT OFF HIS HAND WAAAAAAAAAAAAAH. ;_;"

"...Um. I KNOW, HOW ABOUT WE READ LORD OF THE RINGS INSTEAD?"

"OOH. YAY, ORCS AND BRUTAL KILLING! "

The books are intended for preteens and up- eleven year olds for the first book, twelve for the second, and so on. (Er, I think.)

Yet people keep going on about how these are just perfect for their ickle little darling five-year-olds.

Yeah, sure.

My sister used to read them. I never much got into that stuff. I was reading stuff like "Jane Eyre" and "A Tale of Two Cities" in 3rd grade. Although I did like Judy Blume.