Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:20 am
WIS wrote:zorg wrote:Depends what coin you're using. Most "Tails" sides weigh a little less than the corressponding "head" side. This changes it somehow.
So its like, 49.9999% heads or 50.00001% tails ect.
I think they did a mythbuster on that. Apparently they proved it wrong or something with bread and butter.
Mon Jul 16, 2007 6:39 am
theonlysaneone wrote:WIS wrote:zorg wrote:Depends what coin you're using. Most "Tails" sides weigh a little less than the corressponding "head" side. This changes it somehow.
So its like, 49.9999% heads or 50.00001% tails ect.
I think they did a mythbuster on that. Apparently they proved it wrong or something with bread and butter.
They were trying to prove that the toast always lands butter side down. Of course it doesn't
According to the law of large numbers, the more trials you do, the closer you will likely get to the true probability. Until you get to infinity (which can never happen), there is no guarantee.
Mon Jul 16, 2007 7:25 am
Anoohilator wrote:But they also found, that when dropped from table level, it tends to flip once, and land butter-side down.
Mon Jul 16, 2007 12:08 pm
Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:09 pm
Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:12 pm
CWisgood wrote:Is it because the side with butter is heavier than the unbuttered side or something?
Mon Jul 16, 2007 3:15 pm
Alex wrote:CWisgood wrote:Is it because the side with butter is heavier than the unbuttered side or something?
No, it's because in most instances, there isn't enough time for the bread to flip over twice. (And land unbuttered side up).
Mon Jul 16, 2007 9:16 pm