For those topics one could describe as the forum equivalent of a twinkie. Word games, forum contests and giveaways are all the rage here.
Topic locked

Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:21 pm

I just won't vote...there's really no evidence that I find very convincing [call me crazy]

Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:22 pm

Ammer wrote:
DiscordantNote wrote:
Ammer wrote:I think it's extremely stupid to be voting for Matt. Remember how o_0 posted that picture about some guy thinking or "dreaming" of a gopher? Matt simply commented on it, nothing else.

There is no evidence he's bad, many of you are searching for reasons to simply execute someone.

*shrugs* It's the best lead we have.


That's not a lead. I don't understand how that can be considered a lead when you have no evidence.


I'm with Ammer on this one, matterbug doesn't have any solid evidence against him, except that he posted something with gofer and bad/good. I think we over anaylized that, he should come on and post a defence and then people can vote for someone else, I think we should vote for inactive people and let the randomizer decide between them.

Mon Jun 13, 2005 11:25 pm

Blk Mage wrote:
Ammer wrote:
DiscordantNote wrote:
Ammer wrote:I think it's extremely stupid to be voting for Matt. Remember how o_0 posted that picture about some guy thinking or "dreaming" of a gopher? Matt simply commented on it, nothing else.

There is no evidence he's bad, many of you are searching for reasons to simply execute someone.

*shrugs* It's the best lead we have.


That's not a lead. I don't understand how that can be considered a lead when you have no evidence.


I'm with Ammer on this one, matterbug doesn't have any solid evidence against him, except that he posted something with gofer and bad/good. I think we over anaylized that, he should come on and post a defence and then people can vote for someone else, I think we should vote for inactive people and let the randomizer decide between them.


In that case,

Vote: silverblade333

Hasn't been active.

Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:00 am

[EDIT]

Yay for gofers. BOO for the death of a dreamer.

Now, who to vote for?

Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:24 am

Ammer wrote:In that case,

Vote: silverblade333

Hasn't been active.


In past experience, he usually doesn't post...just sends in lists...

Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:40 am

Ammer wrote:I think it's extremely stupid to be voting for Matt. Remember how o_0 posted that picture about some guy thinking or "dreaming" of a gopher? Matt simply commented on it, nothing else.

There is no evidence he's bad, many of you are searching for reasons to simply execute someone.


Yeah... that's part of the game buddy. We could just sit here and have everyone vote for every other person just because we don't have any leads, but what's the going to do? Nothing. We'll get random executions, still with no reason. It's the same thing except we have no control over it. Besides, why vote for someone for being inactive on day 2? If he's truly inactive, he'll be replaced, if he's not replaced within a few days, then he's safe to kill. But at the moment, voting someone for being inactive, while not really having a chance to be proven inactive seems like a vote just to have an execution as well, which is the exact opposite of what you seem to be trying to do (have an executoion with reason behind it).

Tue Jun 14, 2005 12:54 am

OKay, jobs really are not good for your online playing time.

So- from what I can tell, the main reason everyone is voting for me is that I mentioned gofers. However, the only reason I talked about them was because ALEX posted about it on the first page. She is the director, so I read her posts- it's as simple as that. Here is what Alex posted about halfway down the page-

"Hi, guys. My name's Alex, and I'll be your director for the duration of this movie. There's a variety of people involved in this movie - assistant directors, writers, gofers, lead actors, and more."


I mentioned gofers because I had no idea what it is.

If you want to use my lack of movie knowledge as a reason to vote for me, fine. It's your loss.

Maybe the people that were so quick to accuse me only did it to cover up their own roles.

Edit: For now I'll also Vote: silverblade333, since that's the only real other person that's been voted for. Just because of inactiveness is all- and me trying to not get voted out.

EDIT- Oh, and about why I'm "inactive"- I don't consider not being on every hour of the day inactive- is because I volunteer at a summer camp during the day, and we've had a storm tonight- so I can't go on the computer while there is lightning.

EDIT 2- Oh, and I reread through all the posts, and I wanted to say for all those people that talked about me talking about gofers before anything was said, maybe you should read the directors posts a little more carefully. That's not fair to kill me off because you didn't read it.
Last edited by Matterbug on Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:25 am, edited 1 time in total.

Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:23 am

Unvote: Matterbug

I believe you...for now.

Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:28 am

Are you sure you read all of the other posts? o_0

- Silver is getting spotted for "inactivity" not you (he hasn't posted, you have)
- That quote's been posted about 5 times already, we're aware of it.
- At this point, everyone has the same chance of being bad (yes, that includes me... Clucky... and Clu*cough*).
- An extremely low (don't want to say no one) amount of people spend all of their time on here. Everyone has a life and someone makes that point every game, yet it changes nothing.
- I'm posting in list form... because I'm bored.

And to break out of list form, I like that I should be up when execution and night occur, though I may be gone for work by then. :\ (I leave at 4:45 AM NST)

Anyway...

Unvote - Matterbug

I'm not going to randomly vote and I'm not voting for No Execution, so I'll just hold my vote today. Anyway, no vote is better than No Execution anyway.

Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:38 am

- Silver is getting spotted for "inactivity" not you (he hasn't posted, you have)


Yes, I suppose inactivity was a bad word to use. I'm talking about people saying "if he's not here to defend himself, etc." (And note: I'll be on a similar time frame for the next two weeks (I'll be working during the day)

That quote's been posted about 5 times already, we're aware of it.


I'm just saying that the main reason that everyone voted for me in the first place was because they didn't read that quote before someone pointed it out.

- An extremely low (don't want to say no one) amount of people spend all of their time on here. Everyone has a life and someone makes that point every game, yet it changes nothing.


Yeah, that was just exaggerating in the heat of the moment. Sorry.. :P
Last edited by Matterbug on Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:12 am, edited 2 times in total.

Tue Jun 14, 2005 1:42 am

Unvote: matterbug

I dunno who else to vote for though. Voting for someone just because they're inactive seems silly to me, especially when they may be replaced in the end.

Tue Jun 14, 2005 2:10 am

Ahhhh.... you don't have to worry about that. ;) Since you've posted what's going on, everyone will understand. :D

Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:15 am

I haven't really been inactive because I have posted already and I do read through the posts everyday, except I don't post very often. And I'm going to hold on voting for now, since there isn't anything solid to go on.

Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:46 am

I'm just going to throw out a random vote, because I think the vote's on silver is unfair, it's hard to call someone inactive on day two, plus he really don't post much.

so just to try and even things out I'm gonna vote

Vote: DracolordII

just to add another name to the randomizer.

Tue Jun 14, 2005 4:49 am

vote: fzun
For leading the whole affair against Matt2(hope you dont mind if I call you that) and because I dont have the time to accuallyl serch the thread for eviedence
Topic locked