Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:12 am
Ammer is good though! Why are you killing off all the people we know are good, it doesn't make any sense. I'd rather go for someone we know nothing about or are suspicious of for good reason.
Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:18 am
Monique wrote:Ammer is good though! Why are you killing off all the people we know are good, it doesn't make any sense. I'd rather go for someone we know nothing about or are suspicious of for good reason.
Monique - there are two people claiming to be the same exact role. Usually that signifies either one or the other is bad.
Although... I think I have a conclusion that might help. The names would be themed, I assume, so perhaps both Ammer and Kugetsu can PM the exact name of their role to Clucky? Especially if one is only saying what they do, and not the exact role name. I dunno. o_o;;
Anyways.
Vote: DM was on Fire!
Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:25 am
Twizzler0171 wrote:Monique wrote:Ammer is good though! Why are you killing off all the people we know are good, it doesn't make any sense. I'd rather go for someone we know nothing about or are suspicious of for good reason.
Monique - there are two people claiming to be the same exact role. Usually that signifies either one or the other is bad.
Although... I think I have a conclusion that might help. The names would be themed, I assume, so perhaps both Ammer and Kugetsu can PM the exact name of their role to Clucky? Especially if one is only saying what they do, and not the exact role name. I dunno. o_o;;
Anyways.
Vote: DM was on Fire!
I did already. I PMed my role name and how it fits into my role, in great detail. Of course, since my memory has gone kaput, if Clucky claims to have not gotten this, I'd be more than happy to send it to him. But as I said, I'm pretty sure I at least game him my role name.
If I have to, I'll offer myself for execution tomorrow, at least that way we won't be sitting here wasting time on deciding who's who. And besides, I don't think anyone I've told yet trusts me that much on what I've said.
Mon Jun 20, 2005 1:25 am
A lot of roles sound similar though, and are in fact quite different. Maybe they're just mixing them up, or they weren't clear enough and didn't go into specifics so that's why it seems like that. I don't know the exact circumstances, blah let me see what I can find out.
EDIT:
The roles sound similar, but are still different. Therefore both are good, and we have nothing to worry about.
EDIT EDIT:
I just remembered that Ammer has exams, so I doubt that he'll be online tonight, but I pmed sirclucky with the differences in teh roles, and hopefully he'll be able to clarify it.
EDIT:
The roles sound similar, but are still different. Therefore both are good, and we have nothing to worry about.
EDIT EDIT:
Twizzler0171 wrote:Although... I think I have a conclusion that might help. The names would be themed, I assume, so perhaps both Ammer and Kugetsu can PM the exact name of their role to Clucky? Especially if one is only saying what they do, and not the exact role name. I dunno. o_o;;
[/b]
I just remembered that Ammer has exams, so I doubt that he'll be online tonight, but I pmed sirclucky with the differences in teh roles, and hopefully he'll be able to clarify it.
Mon Jun 20, 2005 2:05 am
Ok, there was a little confustion from getting my infor on ammer from a second hand scoure, but now I everythings clear and they dont have the same role =)
Syrill Qanda and Matt top my suspect list after DM now. If atleast they could give me their roles it might clear some things up
Syrill Qanda and Matt top my suspect list after DM now. If atleast they could give me their roles it might clear some things up
Mon Jun 20, 2005 2:12 am
I'll agree with you on Syrill, Clucky, in fact, I pretty much suspect all of those people (though Qanda moreso than Matt). Syrill has been scampering about barely catching my eye for a while now.
Oh, and even though there's not much to say about this blatant bandwagon, I don't think DM is one of the gofers, but I suppose there's no point in voting otherwise is there (unless there's a decent chance of hitting another vote in the randomizer). Anyway:
Vote - DM was on Fire!
Yes, I already realize I've been doing a terrible job with my voting this game.
Oh, and even though there's not much to say about this blatant bandwagon, I don't think DM is one of the gofers, but I suppose there's no point in voting otherwise is there (unless there's a decent chance of hitting another vote in the randomizer). Anyway:
Vote - DM was on Fire!
Yes, I already realize I've been doing a terrible job with my voting this game.
Mon Jun 20, 2005 2:16 am
sirclucky - you know enough roles, don't you know a dreamer who can dream of one of them?
Mon Jun 20, 2005 2:23 am
Only one. He/she tried dreaming Qanda and their results were intercepted. Not sure if they have done matt or syrill. My dreamer says syrill is an innocent and isnt sure on matt. I say matt dies tomorrow
Mon Jun 20, 2005 2:50 am
Honestly sirclucky, I don't like the way you're handling this game. I for one am not enjoying you commanding everyone to do what you want to do. If you want to help us innocents, fine, but don't command us.
I'll be shocked if you live past tonight due to the fact you've openly stated you know how to find out if someone's bad and what not.
I'll be shocked if you live past tonight due to the fact you've openly stated you know how to find out if someone's bad and what not.
Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:00 am
Ammer wrote:Honestly sirclucky, I don't like the way you're handling this game. I for one am not enjoying you commanding everyone to do what you want to do. If you want to help us innocents, fine, but don't command us.
I'll be shocked if you live past tonight due to the fact you've openly stated you know how to find out if someone's bad and what not.
I wouldn't be surprised, actually. He's survived for quite a few days after his role was revealed.
Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:16 am
Ammer. For a good game to work you need a clear innocent person on the top organizing things. I have some people protecting me so I wont die. Until their deaths, i probably wont die. And im not commanding anyone. Just offering segguestions like any normal person would.
Mon Jun 20, 2005 3:52 am
Do DM first, ammer can go tomorrow.
Sounds like commanding to me.
I'm not saying not to help us out, just do it in a more friendly fashion. I just don't like the way this game is playing out to be. Perhaps it's just personal preference.
Mon Jun 20, 2005 4:32 am
And in that same post I said It was a SEGGUESTION. Seriously, im not ordering anyone around. Just suggesting what I think is best based on the eviednce we have so far. If you dont want to listen to me then thats fine <_<
Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:14 am
sirclucky wrote:Syrill Qanda and Matt top my suspect list after DM now. If atleast they could give me their roles it might clear some things up
Done. You'd better not get converted...
Ammer, I believe sirclucky was just giving suggestions. That's how many people normally phrase their suggestions. Though I admut it sounds rather harsh to hear someone telling you you "can go tomorrow".
I don't think Ammer or Monique are bad though, if they were baddies they wouldn't really risk vouching for each other's innocence.
Mon Jun 20, 2005 7:50 am
Right, since I've been a very bad girl and not checked the thread properly (Alex, you are now allowed to hit me 
), anyone care to update me?
), anyone care to update me?