Twilight

The big screen and the small screen... together at last! Hurrah!

Moderator: Moderators

Message
Author
Katherine
PPT God
PPT God
Posts: 1649
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:11 pm
Location: At a Rascal Flatts Concert
Contact:

Re: Twilight

#61 Post by Katherine »

Regan wrote:I think one of the weirder moments of my happened last week when, in the class I have a bit of my clinical in, I was reading a profile thing of one of the students. One of the questionsasked "What are three of your favourite things?" and one of the 10 year old girls answered "Edward Cullen."

I died a little that day.


I'd die too.

Jacob Black's a much more correct answer.


JK!
Image
Set by the amazing Kitten Medli.
Wanna see some of my writing? Click here!
3lla
PPT God
PPT God
Posts: 2146
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:25 am
Location: HOT DANG!!

Re: Twilight

#62 Post by 3lla »

Katherine wrote:
Regan wrote:I think one of the weirder moments of my happened last week when, in the class I have a bit of my clinical in, I was reading a profile thing of one of the students. One of the questionsasked "What are three of your favourite things?" and one of the 10 year old girls answered "Edward Cullen."

I died a little that day.


I'd die too.

Jacob Black's a much more correct answer.


JK!

Considering Jacob ends up falling in love with a BABY I would say that neither Edward or Jacob are suitable answers
:roll:
Image
set by Sakura
Katherine
PPT God
PPT God
Posts: 1649
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:11 pm
Location: At a Rascal Flatts Concert
Contact:

Re: Twilight

#63 Post by Katherine »

3lla wrote:
Katherine wrote:
Regan wrote:I think one of the weirder moments of my happened last week when, in the class I have a bit of my clinical in, I was reading a profile thing of one of the students. One of the questionsasked "What are three of your favourite things?" and one of the 10 year old girls answered "Edward Cullen."

I died a little that day.


I'd die too.

Jacob Black's a much more correct answer.


JK!

Considering Jacob ends up falling in love with a BABY I would say that neither Edward or Jacob are suitable answers
:roll:

I know. Hence the JK.
Image
Set by the amazing Kitten Medli.
Wanna see some of my writing? Click here!
3lla
PPT God
PPT God
Posts: 2146
Joined: Tue Feb 27, 2007 10:25 am
Location: HOT DANG!!

Re: Twilight

#64 Post by 3lla »

Katherine wrote:
3lla wrote:Considering Jacob ends up falling in love with a BABY I would say that neither Edward or Jacob are suitable answers
:roll:

I know. Hence the JK.

Still, when you look beyond the baby loving, neither Jacob or Edward are suitable for anyone. SRSLY.
Edward = weird creepy stalker guy who will climb into your room for twoo months just to watch you sleep
Jacob = strange self pitying guy who decides to vent his frustration upon that of his 'pack'.

Stephanie Meyer really didn't develop her characters too well.....and don't get me started on Charlie or Emmet.
Image
set by Sakura
Regan
PPT Trainee
PPT Trainee
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:25 am
Location: Asteroid B-612
Contact:

Re: Twilight

#65 Post by Regan »

3lla wrote:Jacob = strange self pitying guy who decides to vent his frustration upon that of his 'pack'.

Is it bad that I didn't pick up on that? I focused more on his perverted tendency to take advantage of Bella. Sick and wrong.
Image
[Manufactured by Byakuya San]
Katherine
PPT God
PPT God
Posts: 1649
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2006 4:11 pm
Location: At a Rascal Flatts Concert
Contact:

Re: Twilight

#66 Post by Katherine »

3lla wrote:
Katherine wrote:
3lla wrote:Considering Jacob ends up falling in love with a BABY I would say that neither Edward or Jacob are suitable answers
:roll:

I know. Hence the JK.

Still, when you look beyond the baby loving, neither Jacob or Edward are suitable for anyone. SRSLY.
Edward = weird creepy stalker guy who will climb into your room for twoo months just to watch you sleep
Jacob = strange self pitying guy who decides to vent his frustration upon that of his 'pack'.

Stephanie Meyer really didn't develop her characters too well.....and don't get me started on Charlie or Emmet.


I think that Charlie was really well developed, personally.
Image
Set by the amazing Kitten Medli.
Wanna see some of my writing? Click here!
DM was on fire!
Way Beyond Godly
Way Beyond Godly
Posts: 8715
Joined: Sat Jun 05, 2004 9:10 pm
Location: Cleveland, Georgia
Contact:

Re: Twilight

#67 Post by DM was on fire! »

Regan wrote:I think one of the weirder moments of my happened last week when, in the class I have a bit of my clinical in, I was reading a profile thing of one of the students. One of the questionsasked "What are three of your favourite things?" and one of the 10 year old girls answered "Edward Cullen."

I died a little that day.


XD!!!
I actually had my name on Subeta "Edward Cullen," (now it's "That One") and I had a million Twihards commenting me "OMG I LOVE TWILIGHT."

I've tried to read the books, and tbh, I can't get into it. The writing is so dry and redundant, and I don't think I've ever really seen such underdeveloped characters. :(
Image
Regan
PPT Trainee
PPT Trainee
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:25 am
Location: Asteroid B-612
Contact:

Re: Twilight

#68 Post by Regan »

DM was on fire! wrote:I've tried to read the books, and tbh, I can't get into it. The writing is so dry and redundant, and I don't think I've ever really seen such underdeveloped characters. :(

I completely agree, but I read the books after I a Chuck Palahniuk binge. Anything not involving deviant addictions and prolapsing intestines was looking good :o

[Edit]

I came across this lovely gem from a Twilight fan, a felt model of Bella's womb.
Discuss.
Image
[Manufactured by Byakuya San]
Helena
PPT God
PPT God
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:15 pm
Location: Wherever there are lulz.

Re: Twilight

#69 Post by Helena »

Regan wrote:I came across this lovely gem from a Twilight fan, a felt model of Bella's womb.
Discuss.


Wait, what. WAIT, WHAT. That's just... Well... o_o
I don't exist. omo
draconis
PPT Trainee
PPT Trainee
Posts: 662
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 3:24 am
Location: Singapore

Re: Twilight

#70 Post by draconis »

Vote: Disturbed.
“Ya know, I think I want to spend the next week or so recreating what Bella’s womb would look like with a mutant fetus inside, and then maybe share it with fans on the internet … because they’ll of course think I’m, like, completely normal and stuff.”

LOL, seriously.
niel/dark_draconis88 on Neo/GPX+

Devourer of Oranges
bzuka
Newbie
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: Wed Aug 12, 2009 1:53 pm
Contact:

Re: Twilight

#71 Post by bzuka »

it is bad movie,just for one view and even that one i was trying no to fall asleep
love red wine )
Callie
PPT Trainee
PPT Trainee
Posts: 624
Joined: Sat Jul 31, 2004 1:46 pm
Location: Here..where does it look like?

Re: Twilight

#72 Post by Callie »

I think the fetus thing was not the best thing to look at right before you're thinking about going to bed...strange is about all I have to say.

Anyway, I was completely against reading Twilight, it didnt sound interesting at all. Then I was forced to see some of the movie at school, of course I wanted to see the whole thing just because I could. Finally I gave in and read the books. I hate to admit it but I secrectly liked them. :oops:

I do agree completely with this and I do not understand the facination with either of them
3lla wrote:Edward = weird creepy stalker guy who will climb into your room for twoo months just to watch you sleep
Jacob = strange self pitying guy who decides to vent his frustration upon that of his 'pack'.

Image
Awesome set by Tomatie
Helena
PPT God
PPT God
Posts: 1709
Joined: Sun Sep 30, 2007 12:15 pm
Location: Wherever there are lulz.

Re: Twilight

#73 Post by Helena »

I'm gonna see New Moon just for the lulz and angstlicious angst angsty angst. Anyone else? :P
I don't exist. omo
unspecialfish
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 408
Joined: Wed Apr 11, 2007 12:13 pm
Location: The Smole Hole!
Contact:

Re: Twilight

#74 Post by unspecialfish »

I read Twilight because my friend was forcing me to. I didn't like it until the battle scene. I was raring to read the second book, but my book had the "sneak peek" first chapter of the next book. After reading that I decided I wouldn't continue, especially since my friend told me that the first book was the best and I begrudgingly go through it.

I started reading the Sookie Stackhouse series recently and realized that this series is everything I though Twilight was going to be, but ten times better. If you're craving a vampire book I suggest reading them. It's the books the HBO hit TrueBlood was based after. Keep in mind HBO has made the show's first season very similar to the first book and they rate it MA.
Image
Like in waiting rooms and long lines that made you late or mall parking lots on holidays
Blog | Flickr | Twitter | Zune
Image
Regan
PPT Trainee
PPT Trainee
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Feb 05, 2007 7:25 am
Location: Asteroid B-612
Contact:

Re: Twilight

#75 Post by Regan »

You know, I can't see how people like one series and dislike the other. I think they are both pretty bad and full of the lulz. However, True Blood is a wicked good show.

I read the first Sookie Stackhouse bood. It was so. bad. I'm sorry.
Image
[Manufactured by Byakuya San]
Locked